So, the present properties were the ones that QLab itself was designed to use. > would be useful to understand what the thinking is here. > are very few properties available (size, opacity etc) - and so it > the QC-integration facilities in Q元? For example, at present, there > but are you in a position yet to give any sort of information about
I will avoid asking the obvious timescale questions, > - I know you have hinted at some of the V3 features around the It is not triggering other software, but it is actually playing back the videos itself, based on incoming timecode.
Loq is designed to work with anything that generates timecode.
QLAB PRO MULTIPLE VIDEO OUTPUTS WINDOWS
> trigger anything running on a windows machine (I know.) > designed to work with Qlab only? For example, could I use it to If you use it with QLab, you'd only need one machine running QLab (to generate MIDI Timecode sent to the Loq machines). Loq can be used completely independently of QLab. > Loq on it require a licensed copy of Qlab? Ible to actually cue a show entirely in QC. It is possible to do this via QC and I have done it once but it is a little bit tricky compared to pretty much anything else and QC is also pretty much imposs Someone just mentioned Quartz Composer as well. A financial middle ground would be something like Arkaos, Pandora's Box, or Catalyst which would definitely allow you to keep playback synched up but would be able to do a few outputs from each license/computer to save.
QLAB PRO MULTIPLE VIDEO OUTPUTS PLUS
If money is no issue, then something like Watchout would be perfect though Watchout is a per-output licensing scheme so it would come in a round $20k plus the cost of 9 computers. If you are open to looking at other programs, several users (myself included) have made user actors/patches to do this via OSC with Isadora which is relatively inexpensive. There are multiple, easy ways to start the videos in sync but keeping that way is a little trickier. I'm not really sure how I would go about keeping multiple videos across multiple computers in sync with QLab. (I wonder if there are other, non-figure 53 products that can solve this problem without too much expense? Or is cost not an issue?) Others on the list will, I am sure, have other suggestions that I'm not thinking of at the moment. If that sounds like it might be useful, I could send you a beta to try when it is ready. (A loq document is a list of video cues with timecode assigned to each one)Īs I said, it's still being tested and bugs are still being fixed, but in theory it should provide synchronized video playback Across multiple machines. It listens to incoming timecode and then plays back video cues locked to that timecode. We're tentatively calling it "Loq", and the idea is that it's a relatively small/inexpensive program to put on multiple machines. It's still in internal testing-not yet out in the hands of beta testers-but we're hoping to get it into beta very soon. (I suppose this is as good a time as any to reveal something about it.) Well, one possible answer is that we have a new product in development intended to provide synced video playback across multiple machines. Please visit the individual product pages for more information and to find out which QuadHead2Go, TripleHead2Go, or DualHead2Go models are recommended for your system.Good question. * Additional adaptors may be required (sold separately). DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort or Thunderbolt
0 kommentar(er)
